Department of Oncology
Department Staff
Sayakov Umetaly Karagulovich
Sayakov Umetaly Karagulovich
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Academic title:
Assosiate Professor
Position:
Head of the Department
Dyikanbaeva Saikal Kachkynovna
Dyikanbaeva Saikal Kachkynovna
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Academic title:
Assosiate Professor
Position:
Head teacher of the Department
Akhunbaev Stalbek Mederovich
Akhunbaev Stalbek Mederovich
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Academic title:
Assosiate Professor
Djumabaeva Fatima Turusbekovich
Djumabaeva Fatima Turusbekovich
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Academic title:
Assosiate Professor
Amerhanov Hojahmed Kosumovich
Amerhanov Hojahmed Kosumovich
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Academic title:
Assosiate Professor
Lim Evgeniya Fedorovna
Lim Evgeniya Fedorovna
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Academic title:
Assosiate Professor
Sitnikova Yulia Georgievna
Sitnikova Yulia Georgievna
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Position:
Assistant
Alimjonov Nodirbek Yulchibekovich
Alimjonov Nodirbek Yulchibekovich
Academic degree:
Candidate of Medicine
Position:
Assistant
Orozaliev Murat Batyrhanovich
Orozaliev Murat Batyrhanovich
Position:
Assistant
Kemelbekova Ainura Kemelbekovna
Kemelbekova Ainura Kemelbekovna
Position:
Assistant
Omokeeva Baktygul Almazbekovna
Omokeeva Baktygul Almazbekovna
Position:
Assistant
Vaninov Abdurahman Suleimanovich
Vaninov Abdurahman Suleimanovich
Position:
Assistant
Kylchykbaev Azamat Keneshbekovich
Kylchykbaev Azamat Keneshbekovich
Position:
Assistant
Kim Andrei Mironovich
Kim Andrei Mironovich
Position:
Assistant
Sayakov Orunbek
Sayakov Orunbek
Position:
Assistant
Absatarova Azatkul
Absatarova Azatkul
Position:
Assistant
Brief history

The Department of Oncology was established in 1974. The first head of the department (1986) was the Honored Scientist of the USSR, Professor A. I. Saenko. On the initiative of A. I. Saenko, in 1959, the Kyrgyz Scientific Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology (KNIIR) was organized in Kyrgyzstan, on the basis of which, according to the Decree of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic, the National Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Kyrgyz Republic was organized in 2000.

From 1988 to 1996, the department was headed by the Honored Doctor of the Kyrgyz Republic, laureate of the State Prize of the Kyrgyz Republic, Professor X. S. Bebezov. Under H. S. Bebezov, thoracic oncology received a great impetus in its development. He introduced the most complex operations on the esophagus, lungs, mediastinum; received a patent for the invention of a new method of suturing the stump of the bronchi.

From 1996 to 2017, the Department of Oncology was headed by Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor I. O. Kudaibergenova. From 1997 to 1999, Professor I. O. Kudaibergenova simultaneously headed the Kyrgyz Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology. During these years, close contacts were established with the leading scientific cancer centers of the world (RSCI of the RSFSR Academy of Medical Sciences, the University of Kansas (USA), the Kazakh Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology). On her initiative, the Association of Oncologists and Radiologists of the Kyrgyz Republic was established, which Professor I. O. Kudaibergenova heads to this day.

Since 2017, the head of the Department of Oncology is Sayakov Umetaly Karagulovich

Disciplines

Oncology

Scientific  activity

Since 1996, the staff of the department has published more than 80 scientific papers, including 6 monographs.

Personalized medicine for patients with double and/or triple negative breast cancer

This study is a revolutionary method for screening patients with twice and/or thrice negative breast cancer (HER2-, ER-, PR-) responding and not responding to monotherapy and/or combination therapy with the drugs fluorouracil, carboplatin, paclitaxel, gemzar, docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, herceptin

Core Protocol

  1. Objectives & Hypotheses

The objectives of this retrospective, study are to:

  • 1) To determine the spectral characteristics of the effect of the studied drugs on macromolecular aggregates in whole blood and/or single-core peripheral blood cells in patients with thrice-negative breast cancer and twice-negative breast cancer.
  • 2) Identify biomarkers and spectral profiles associated with response.
  • 3) To determine responders and non- responder profiles treated with fluorouracil, carboplatin, paclitaxel, gemzar, docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, herceptin as single therapy and/or in combination with an immune check-point blockade antibody, using with the aim to:
  1. Predict responders/non-responders before the onset of treatment
  2. Provide guidance for development of new therapies for the non-responder group

Expected impacts

The result of this proposal is the development of reliable methods to improve the effectiveness of treatment and personalized medicine. These new methods simplify the clinical monitoring of the treatment of twice and thrice negative breast cancer and allow for detailed data analysis, which will stimulate the development of new treatment methods. These new techniques can be adapted to other pathologies.

This could have a highly beneficial impact on patient health through personalized therapy which would significantly decrease negative side effects. These methodologies could reduce the costs of clinical trials by at least 30% thanks to the reliability of the small-scale clinical data trials to which these methods are applied.

  1. Background & Rationale, Significance of Selected Topic & Preliminary Data

Cancer treatment is the perfect example of wasteful one size fits all therapy as the ideal treatment requires personalized and constant monitoring of disease and other biomarkers. The genetic markers that most current therapies are based on lack clinical relevance, especially after several rounds of unresponsive therapy change the tumor microenviroment.

Cancer constantly evolves from bad to worse. This can be accelerated if the chosen treatment fails to stop its progression due to iatrogenic modification. The challenge we are facing is to identify and validate markers that are able to predict treatment efficacy in a fast and highly reliable fashion in order to avoid missing the therapeutic window or at least to prevent worsening of clinical condition due to inadequate treatment strategy.

Personalized medicine for patients with microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer and microsatellite-unstable metastatic colorectal cancer.

A breakthrough approach for screening responders and non-responders to   treatment fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, xeloda, irinotecan, avstin (bevacizumab) as single therapy and/or in combination with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients compared with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer and  microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer

Core Protocol

  1. Objectives & Hypotheses

The objectives of this retrospective, study are to:

  • 1) Determine the spectral characteristics of study drugs on macromolecular assemblies in whole blood and / or PBMCs from patients with microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer and microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer
  • 2) Identify biomarkers and spectral profiles associated with response.

To determine responders and non- responder profiles treated with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, xeloda, irinotecan, avstin (bevacizumab) as single therapy and/or in combination with an immune check-point blockade antibody, using with the aim to:

  1. Predict responders/non-responders before the onset of treatment
  2. Provide guidance for development of new therapies for the non-responder group

Expected impacts

The outcome of this proposal is the development of robust methodologies for increased treatment efficacy and personalized medicine. These new methods simplify clinical monitoring of treatment for microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer and microsatellite instable metastatic colorectal cancer and allow for detailed data analysis that will spur development of new therapies. These new methodologies could be adapted to other pathologies.

This could have a highly beneficial impact on patient health through personalized therapy which would significantly decrease negative side effects. These methodologies could reduce the costs of clinical trials by at least 30% thanks to the reliability of the small-scale clinical data trials to which these methods are applied.

  1. Background & Rationale, Significance of Selected Topic & Preliminary Data

Cancer treatment is the perfect example of wasteful one size fits all therapy as the ideal treatment requires personalized and constant monitoring of disease and other biomarkers. The genetic markers that most current therapies are based on lack clinical relevance, especially after several rounds of unresponsive therapy change the tumor microenviroment.

Cancer constantly evolves from bad to worse. This can be accelerated if the chosen treatment fails to stop its progression due to iatrogenic modification. The challenge we are facing is to identify and validate markers that are able to predict treatment efficacy in a fast and highly reliable fashion in order to avoid missing the therapeutic window or at least to prevent worsening of clinical condition due to inadequate treatment strategy.

Clinical bases of the Department

National Center of Oncology and Hematology of the Ministry of Health of the Kyrgyz Republic.

Address: 91а Akhunbayeva str.